Insights · Market Research
Researching new territories: look before you leap
Expanding into a new territory on optimism alone is how good businesses waste real money. Researching a territory first — its buyers, competition, rules, and how business is done there — turns expansion from a gamble into an informed decision, and reveals whether the territory is worth entering at all.
Researching a new territory means understanding it before you commit — the buyers and how they buy, the competitors already there, the local rules and business norms, and the genuine opportunity. It reveals whether and how a territory is worth entering, before you spend to find out.
Every territory is its own market, different from your home ground, so what works at home may not transfer. Territory research prevents the expensive mistake of assuming familiarity, and it informs the smartest route in — often through local partners who already know the territory.
- ~75% of world commerce flows through indirect and channel sales rather than direct.
- just 17% of the B2B buying journey is spent meeting with potential suppliers.
Why It Matters Now
What the data shows
The evidence is hard to ignore.
Why this matters for your brand
Researching new territories before expanding into them is one of those disciplines that feels like it slows you down but actually saves enormous time and money, because the alternative — expanding on optimism and assumption — fails expensively and often. The seductive mistake is to treat a new territory as simply more of the same: your product works in your home market, so it should work in a new one; your sales approach succeeds where you are, so it should succeed elsewhere; and the fastest way to find out is just to go. But this assumption of familiarity is precisely what makes unresearched expansion so risky, because every territory is genuinely its own market, distinct from your home ground in ways that matter. The buyers may have different needs, priorities, and buying habits. The competitive landscape is likely entirely different, with local players already established. The rules, regulations, and business norms differ, sometimes dramatically. And the cultural expectations around how selling and buying happen may be nothing like what you're used to. Assuming these differences away doesn't make them go away; it just means you discover them the expensive way, after you've committed budget to a launch built on wrong assumptions.
Territory research replaces that assumption with understanding, and it does two valuable things. First, it tells you whether the territory is worth entering at all — by revealing the genuine size and shape of the opportunity, the strength of the competition, and the difficulty of the market, it lets you make an informed go/no-go decision before spending, rather than committing to a territory that a little research would have shown was too small, too crowded, or too difficult to be worth it. Many expensive expansion failures are really failures to ask, honestly and in advance, whether the territory was worth entering — a question research answers. Second, for the territories that are worth entering, research informs how to enter well: understanding the local buyers lets you adapt your approach and messaging; understanding the competition lets you position against it; understanding the rules and norms lets you operate appropriately; and understanding the market shapes the crucial route-to-market decision. That last point is where territory research so often points toward partners: building your own presence in an unfamiliar territory is slow and expensive, whereas a good local partner already possesses the relationships, market knowledge, and reach that would take you years to build — which is a large part of why roughly three-quarters of commerce flows through indirect channels, and why partner-led entry, informed by good research into which partners fit, is so frequently the smartest, lowest-risk way into a new territory. Research also respects how buyers now behave, since they do most of their own research before engaging and expect sellers who understand their market. The businesses that research territories before expanding enter only worthwhile ones, with strategies fitted to local reality and often through partners who know the ground; those that expand on the assumption that a new territory is just more of their home market keep discovering, one expensive failed expansion at a time, that every territory is different and that the research they skipped would have cost a tiny fraction of the mistakes they made instead.
The Benefits
The benefits
Understand before committing
Research the buyers, competition, and rules before you spend to enter.
Every territory differs
What works at home may not transfer — research reveals the real differences.
Reveals if it's worth it
Research shows whether a territory is genuinely worth entering at all.
Informs the route in
Findings guide the smartest entry — often through local partners.
How Allans helps
Allans researches new territories before you expand — buyers, competition, rules, and opportunity — and helps you enter through the right local partners.
We turn territory expansion from a gamble into an informed decision, revealing whether and how each territory is worth entering.
Frequently Asked
Questions, answered.
Why research a new territory before expanding?
Because every territory is its own market — different buyers, competition, rules, and norms — and assuming familiarity is expensive. Research reveals whether a territory is genuinely worth entering and how best to enter, before you commit real money to find out.
What should territory research cover?
The buyers and how they buy, the competitors already established there, local rules and business norms, and the genuine size and shape of the opportunity — everything you need to judge whether and how to enter.
How does territory research reduce risk?
By replacing assumptions with understanding before you commit, so you enter only worthwhile territories, with a strategy fitted to local reality, rather than discovering the territory's differences and difficulties the expensive way after launching.
Should I use local partners to enter a new territory?
Often yes — local partners bring existing reach, relationships, and knowledge of the territory that dramatically speed entry and cut risk, which is why so much cross-border and cross-territory commerce flows through channels. Research helps identify the right ones.
Expanding into new territories on optimism?
Let's research each territory first — and enter the worthwhile ones through the right partners.
Talk to Allans →